Lack of Environment

A blog on the politics and psychology underlying the denial of all our environmental problems

Getting turkeys to vote for Christmas

with 20 comments

I have been using this analogy a lot recently.  This is because, as I explained to potentially-baffled readers on Learning from Dogs recently, I am using it to summarise the essence of the final part in Schalk’s recent series on the unfolding collapse of the global economy: That the people with the power will not relinquish it voluntarily and, in the meantime, they have our politicians completely fixated on burning fossil fuels simply because “they are there”

This may be a legitimate reason to climb mountains; but it is no way to manage a planet.

I summarised all of the above in my previous two posts but, once again, with my thanks to Schalk Cloete (Oneinabillion blog), let me re-state the potential solutions and the obstacles we face, as simply as possible:

The potential solutions (see Schalk’s Heal the System):
– Minimise our wasteful consumption of non-renewable resources and energy.
– Eliminate business and economic practices that encourage over-consumption.
– Live within our means and start paying-off our currently mortgaged future.
– Educate women in poor countries to eliminate excessive population growth.

The obstacles to implementation (see Schalk’s Practical Challenges):
– Convince hundreds of millions of people that consuming things will not make them happy.
– Invest in things that benefit society (not those who are already wealthy).
Spend less than we earn and save the rest (not spend more and borrow the difference).
– Acknowledge the needs of future generations (not just assert our rights to please ourselves).

With my thanks to Pendantry, one of the most faithful visitors to this blog, I have become aware that the day on which our annual consumption of the Earth’s resources exceeded its annual supply, Earth Overshoot Day, was 22 August this year. I find this particularly shocking because Earth Overshoot Day was 27 September last year.  That is 36 days earlier (86% of the time it took last year).  I am not sure how such a large change since last year can be possible (it is certainly not sustainable) but even if the goalposts have been moved in some way, we certainly should not be complacent.

Use it up and wear it out is OK when cleaning your teeth; but it’s no way to manage a planet.

With my thanks to JPGreenword, another faithful friend of this site, I offer these very prescient words of wisdom from one of the greatest scientists that the World has ever known:

“The world will not evolve past its current state of crisis by using the same thinking that created the situation.” – Albert Einstein

Finally, I must return to something else Schalk has written, this time as a guest post on Learning from Dogs, where he says that we must… “motivate people to take action by strongly emphasizing on the immediate personal benefits of making these lifestyle changes…”

It is often said that charity begins at home but, so to, it seems, will revolution.  However, the revolution we now need is not merely political – it is psychological and metaphysical.  To be sure, political revolution has been tried; and it has always failed.  Therefore, what humans need now is a revolution of the mind; such that we may all perceive what we are doing to this planet and – in addition to living within our own individual means – live within the our planetary means.

I’m spending my kids’ inheritance is OK as a car sticker; but it’s no way to manage a planet.

I think the solution therefore lies in getting our politicians to look beyond the ballot box – to see the World that we are currently bequeathing to our children – and if that requires widespread civil disobedience, so be it.  We may think we live in a democracy, where government of the people, by the people, for the people, has been a longstanding benefit.  Sadly, however, if it was ever a reality, it is now a cruel myth because, in almost every case, what we are suffering from at present is government of the people, by the politicians, for the plutocrats.

I believe we can get the turkeys to vote for Christmas.
However, nothing worthwhile has ever been achieved without a struggle.  Therefore, in order to do this, we must break the stranglehold that big business has upon our politicians.  Sadly, this is an almost impossible task but, if anything can precipitate it, I am certain that the realisation that we face an impending ecological catastrophe can do it.  The alternative, of course, is that which Jared Diamond has described in Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, in that governments spend more and more money ensuring their own survival rather than tackling the cause of their growing instability.

I really do hope we can avoid that scenario but, if we are to do so – if we are to get our political turkeys to vote for a carbon-free Christmas – we will have to convince them we must all become “vegetarians”; and invite them to join us as we celebrate with the nutloaf of renewable energy instead of the meat of fossil fuels.

About these ads

20 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. All very good set of observations. But, just like Jared Diamond, it struggles to avoid the concept of plutocracy. To condemn plutocray is not politically correct, (as far as the plutocrats and their sycophants are concerned). However, the problem is not just “big business”. After all Siemens, certainly big and a business, refused to finance and support Hitler. The one million + words on my sites go thoroughly into plutocracy and the fascist instinct.

    The irony is that the root, the evolutionary pressure for plutocracy was… ecology. But I am the bearing of bad news, as Paul Handover seems to say, and thus “as myopic” as the CO2 plutocrats. But the plutocrats are not myopic, just hungry. Those who think they are “myopic” have understood nothing. Was Hitler “myopic”?

    And this is why philosophers are always in a fight to death.

    Patrice Ayme

    31 August 2012 at 01:18

    • There you go banging on about Hitler again; and still you have not answered my question why you seem to criticise Muslims and Christians a lot but almost never the Jews? However, surely I should at least be credited for using the term plutocrats (I think this is a first time for me)?

      Martin Lack

      31 August 2012 at 08:43

    • If you can find some way to do it, Patrice, you simply must watch this new programme broadcast in the UK last night: The Nazi Temple of Doom: Revealed… It demonstrates the spurious pagan basis for Nazi beliefs as developed by Hienrich Himler; and the lengths he went to to establish a completely false basis for those beliefs (a bit like any other Cult really). Therefore, whereas I agree with you that there were many around the Nazis that did not dare confront them (such as all the Protestant and Catholic Churches), I do not think you should use Hitler as a stick with which to beat Christianity (which I feel you often seem to do).

      Martin Lack

      31 August 2012 at 08:53

  2. Wonderful metaphor, Martin, and excellent thesis here. You are getting clearer and clearer in mapping out the problems and what needs to be done.

    Are you familiar with Arundhati’s Roys’ use of turkeys as a metaphor as well? I can’t resist quoting from her essay here:

    “The tradition of `turkey pardoning’ in the U.S. is a wonderful allegory for New Racism. Every year since 1947, the National Turkey Federation presents the U.S. President with a turkey for Thanksgiving. Every year, in a show of ceremonial magnanimity, the President spares that particular bird (and eats another one). After receiving the presidential pardon, the Chosen One is sent to Frying Pan Park in Virginia to live out its natural life. The rest of the 50 million turkeys raised for Thanksgiving are slaughtered and eaten on Thanksgiving Day. ConAgra Foods, the company that has won the Presidential Turkey contract, says it trains the lucky birds to be sociable, to interact with dignitaries, school children and the press. (Soon they’ll even speak English!)

    “That’s how New Racism in the corporate era works. A few carefully bred turkeys — the local elites of various countries, a community of wealthy immigrants, investment bankers, the occasional Colin Powell, or Condoleezza Rice, some singers, some writers (like myself) — are given absolution and a pass to Frying Pan Park. The remaining millions lose their jobs, are evicted from their homes, have their water and electricity connections cut, and die of AIDS. Basically they’re for the pot. But the Fortunate Fowls in Frying Pan Park are doing fine. Some of them even work for the IMF and the WTO — so who can accuse those organisations of being anti-turkey? Some serve as board members on the Turkey Choosing Committee — so who can say that turkeys are against Thanksgiving? They participate in it! Who can say the poor are anti-corporate globalisation? There’s a stampede to get into Frying Pan Park. So what if most perish on the way?”
    http://www.hindu.com/2004/01/18/stories/2004011800181400.htm

    I think this allegory could be adapted to the climate change scenario we face today. The elites of all nations still hope to get into Frying Pan Park–a safe haven where they will not have to face the fallout that the rest of us will be dealing with as the planet heats up: erratic and destructive weather patterns, food shortages, riots, etc etc. What they must be made to realize is that there is no safe harbor from this coming storm. We are all in it together on this planet, from the smallest insect to the food chain dominants like eagles, lions and humans. And–what may be scariest of all–there is no one capable of giving out any pardons.

    Keep on keeping on, Martin! You give me hope….

    Jennifer Browdy de Hernandez

    31 August 2012 at 01:50

    • Thanks for your kind words, Jennifer. Having been given some forthright but constructive criticism of my general style of writing, I am trying very hard to write using short simple sentences; avoid long ones with lots of complex punctuation (and brackets) – like this one! :-)

      I had not heard of Arundhati Roys or the Tradition of turkey pardoning; although the latter is very clearly a corruption of the Jewish tradition of the Scapegoat: A goat was selected every year to have the sins of all Jewish people transferred to it; and was then sent out into the desert to fend for itself (and probably die): Clearly this was one of the many roles with which Jesus of Nazareth deliberately self-identified. However, whilst I agree that tokenism is rife in Western countries; I doubt that Barrack Obama would want anyone to think he achieved his position on the basis of anything other than merit..!

      On the subject of metaphor (repetition and alliteration, etc.), I hope it is clear that this was very deliberate (and it is fun trying to be creative with words). In this, you and many others have been my inspiration; so keep up your good work too… :-)

      Martin Lack

      31 August 2012 at 09:11

  3. Good stuff :-) I think we are coming ever closer to distilling our global crises and the solutions to these crises to a sufficiently short, understandable and catchy form. Such a perfectly tailored message will be essential to accomplishing the ultimate goal: encouraging behavioral change in millions of people who are, at present, not even aware of these threats.

    In the end, I think that the primary question that all of us “sustainability bloggers” should be concerned with is “how can this (the above-mentioned goal) be achieved most efficiently?”

    If you are interested, I’ve briefly described some ideas (or rather dreams) of how this can be done here: http://oneinabillionblog.com/dream/. (Don’t worry, this is much shorter than all of the other page-series on my blog ;-) )

    Some dialogue about these kinds of solutions might be an interesting next step…

    Schalk

    31 August 2012 at 08:30

    • Thanks Schalk. As I have just said to Jennifer, I am very deliberately trying to make my sentences shorter and the presentation of them memorable. It is very nice to see that this is recognised, appreciated and acknowledged. Thanks also for the link to your latest thread; I will take a look later.

      Martin Lack

      31 August 2012 at 09:14

  4. I thank you, Mr.Lack, for the latest article. In your correspondence you often mention a gentleman with the name Schalk. Who is he and where can I obtain copies of his writings? For any help I would be most grateful.

    Sorry, this is, of course, space for comments. Just one question. What has old AH and his views-Weltanschuung-have to do with the present disastrous ecological situation? I am aware that certain cults-communists in general etc. – resort to the Hitler cudgel when losing the argument but I cannot make the connection in this matter. After all, one can hardly describe the man who left but RM30,00 in his bank account when he died as a “plutocrat”.

    Duncan

    31 August 2012 at 09:21

    • Hello again Duncan. Presumably your connection to the Internet is not showing hypertext links (to other websites) embedded in my text? However, as I am sure I explained the first I mentioned him, Schalk Cloete is a South African research scientist now living and working in Norway. He has recently set up his own blog, which may be found at http://oneinabillionblog.com/ (I am not aware that he has published any books).

      Martin Lack

      31 August 2012 at 09:33

  5. Hello Martin,

    I enjoyed the repetition of pithy statements in this post. They add impact. I can picture a whole blog post around each one. Have you read (plan to read) Joe Romm’s latest book on communication, “Language Intelligence”?

    You say, “the revolution we now need is not merely political – it is psychological and metaphysical”, but surely even that is limited. Most of all, the revolution we need is physical – we are taking the first baby steps on the path to an energy revolution that will radically transform our energy systems.

    My latest post (http://bit.ly/OOSx0S) discusses the energy future under the heading “No succession plan for ExxonMobil”.

    It’s nice to see commenters here refer to “sustainability bloggers” because I value the role played by bloggers who share the journey towards a radically different future. They/we are part of the psychological revolution whereby we envision the future we are moving towards. Without a clear vision of the destination, our journey will be aimless and stumbling.

    Gillian King

    1 September 2012 at 07:40

    • Thanks Gillian. I am no longer a great reader of books (in the conventional sense) but will investigate Romm’s book. Presumably it is along similar lines as those on “emotional intelligence”? You are of course quite correct; we need a revolution on all fronts and, if our politicians won’t do it for us, we may have to do it for ourselves. I have spent a week focusing on potential ways to solve our problematic abuse of reality. However, given the feedback I have received (here and elsewhere), I will now return to use such pithy statements to highlight the idiotic denial of reality. Judging by your latest post you may well be ahead of me!

      Martin Lack

      1 September 2012 at 09:41

    • The role played by bloggers could be much more key than we all realise. The interconnectedness of the millions who inhabit the world of the internet is significant. Just a short while ago I was reading this week’s Economist and there on page 8 of the quarterly technology review was a piece about social networking. From which I quote:

      “In 2011 Facebook analysed the 721m users of its social-networking site and found that an average of 4.7 hops could link any two of them via mutual friends. A small world is now, it seems, even smaller.”

      Paul

      Paul Handover

      1 September 2012 at 23:21

      • Thanks for sharing that snippet of information about Facebook. I feel it kind of vindicates my cynicism regarding the Versatile Blogger award, One Lovely Blog award, or What Shall We Call It This Week award – which are is just designed to waste the time of credulous people (IMHO).

        Martin Lack

        2 September 2012 at 10:49

  6. [...] so will aggravate the damage we have already done to our climate.  As was implied by something I wrote much more recently, we may climb mountains just because they are there, but is it really sensible to apply the same [...]

  7. [...] Turkeys won’t vote for Christmas unless we force them to do it! Share this:EmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]

  8. My 2d: the plutocrats need to be reminded what can be made from a a length of rope with a closable bight at one end, and a few sturdy beams of wood. Preferably while there are still some trees left.
    PS I agree that your writing style is improving.
    PPS I like nutloaf.

    pendantry

    14 December 2012 at 21:00

    • Thanks pendantry. However – Why this comment now on this post published more than 100 days ago (was it a trackback from the slightly younger fracking posts)?
      P.S. I think we all need to learn to love the nutloaf.

      Martin Lack

      14 December 2012 at 21:44

      • The question is: ‘Why not?’

        I keep meaning to complete the draft of my post I’ve tentatively titled ‘Hold the front page’, which is a rant about all those people who seem unable to unlink blogs from traditional news media.

        Put it this way: is the post I’ve responded to any less relevant today than it was when you wrote it?

        pendantry

        15 December 2012 at 16:52

        • Not at all – and I am very grateful for all comments; then, now, or in the future. :-)

          Martin Lack

          15 December 2012 at 17:57

        • :)

          pendantry

          15 December 2012 at 19:46


Please join the discussion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 248 other followers

%d bloggers like this: