Lack of Environment

A blog on the politics and psychology underlying the denial of all our environmental problems

Past performance is not a predictor of future results

with 6 comments

As it says on my About page,  “The driver of an accelerating car about to hit a brick wall might well say ‘so far so good’ – but that does not mean that the wall is not there!” — John Dryzek (2005: 70).

“So far so good… No! Wait!… Oh shi…”

This is the almost-ubiquitous advice of stockbrokers but, sadly, it is almost universally ignored.

As ccgwebmaster recently observed wryly in a comment on this very blog:

I have never died before. Does this mean I can presume upon my immortality?

I would therefore like to take this opportunity to make a few suggestions to all those who think concern for the environment is a false alarm, a new religion, or an excuse to curtail your freedom or tax you more heavily:
1. Grow up.
2. Go back to school.
3. Open your eyes and look out the window.
4. Stop cherry-picking data that reinforces your prejudice.
5. Stop ignoring all the data that contradicts your misperception of reality.
6. Read this Wikipedia article on the New World Order – it might just open up your mind.
7. Read this Skeptical Science article on the History of Climate Science – it might just resolve your confusion.

About these ads

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. If I could work out how one could possibly get the information into the brain of a pathologically optimistic person in the first place, I’d be pushing this link more (or more precisely the research it refers to)…

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111009140201.htm

    There’s a nasty catch 22 – if one is inappropriately optimistic about climate change, one is also likely to be inappropriately optimistic in being presented with the scientific evidence for your inappropriate optimism, meaning your brain will still reject the new information. Most unhelpful, but at least illuminating! I suspect it may relate to normalcy bias, but don’t believe the research precisely addressed that (our tendency to think in linear process terms rather than positive feedback ones is also a handicap).

    It isn’t just deniers that this affects – it also inhibits the ability of even those who understand the climate change situation to assess and respond to the risks. So before one gets smug about not being a denier, one should still reflect – is one being inappropriately optimistic?

    ccgwebmaster

    18 April 2013 at 04:37

    • All, sadly, very true. Dr Tari Sharot has called this ‘Optimism Bias’ and suggested it is an evolutionary survival mechanism (one which has mutated into a self-destructive mechanism due to a self-inflicted threat).
      See: http://lackofenvironment.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/global-weirding-and-optimism-bias/

      Martin Lack

      18 April 2013 at 10:32

    • It’s weird: even as a teenager, I recall wondering whether intelligence was counterproductive. Current indications are that, indeed, it is.

      pendantry

      18 April 2013 at 19:19

      • Had that thought when younger too. Stand by my conclusion that if you want a solid evolutionary lineage big sharp teeth are the way to go (sharks, crocodiles) though arguably earthworms must be doing something right too…

        It’s an interesting addition to the problem of large distances for interstellar travel. Statistically advanced intelligence must arise on countless planets in the universe. What is the probability of if persisting long enough to wisely and sustainably travel out into the universe, versus destroying itself fulfilling short term evolutionary urges though? Correlate that with the distances and short lived nature of intelligence, and the probability of meeting the neighbours is vanishingly small.

        Still, if one has it, one might as well try to use it.

        ccgwebmaster

        18 April 2013 at 19:41

        • Yep, I feel pretty sure that in the case of homo fatuus brutus, L in the Drake equation is about as big as a pair of centipedes strutting around the park wearing thermal underwear and singing “Jerusalem”.

          pendantry

          18 April 2013 at 19:55

  2. [...] 2013/04/16: LoE: Past performance is not a predictor of future results [...]


Please join the discussion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 314 other followers

%d bloggers like this: